Well-being paradigms and the possibility of a sustainability transition

The project examines the connections between the sustainability transition and the concept of sustainable well-being (1) by studying the forms of prevailing well-being paradigms in modern societies and their impact on the possibilities for a profound sustainability transition, and (2) examining the potential of an additional well-being paradigm, planetary well-being, as a promoter of a deep sustainability transition and a reformer of social policy.
Hyvinvoinnin paradigmat ja kestävyysmurroksen mahdollisuus

Table of contents

Project duration
-
Core fields of research
Languages, culture and society
Research areas
JYU.Wisdom
Hyvinvointi, kestävyys ja sivistys
Department
Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy
Faculty
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Funding
Kone Foundation

Project description

Our project examines the current paradigms of well-being in Finnish society and their connection to the possibilities of a sustainability transition:

1. identifying the current paradigms of well-being and their content

2. examining their connection to the possibilities of a sustainability transition

3. constructing a socio-theoretical framework for an alternative planetary well-being paradigm.

Previous research on the sustainability transition has focused on socio-technical solutions, transition policy, and the fairness of the transition. A more fundamental question about the content of sustainable well-being has been left aside, but it is critically important for the sustainability transition: wealthy countries have built well-being through material living standards, and production growth is justified by its effects on well-being. On the other hand, transition can weaken the well-being of some population groups. Increasing well-being as a generally accepted goal of societies means that prevailing paradigms of well-being can have a major impact on what kind of transition policies are opposed or accepted. However, the relationship between paradigms and the transition to sustainability has not been studied empirically or from the perspective of well-being. We address this research gap using methods from social sciences, ethnology, and philosophy.

Our theoretical tools are the tipping point theory of systemic change and planetary well-being. WP1 examines the prevailing paradigms of well-being in our society and their connections to promoting sustainability transition. WP2 ties the project to the current state of sustainability transition in Finland by looking at the end of peat energy use and the projects of the Just Transition Fund. WP3 produces tools for critical reflection on paradigms, an alternative framework for well-being (human well-being as part of planetary well-being), and seeks avenues for influencing paradigm change. The knowledge produced in the project supports the possibilities for a profound sustainability transition, as well as research and critical social debate on sustainable well-being.

Previous publications related to the project

Hirvilammi, T., & Kortetmäki, T. (2025). Eco-social policies for planetary well-being. In The Eco-Social Polity? (pp. 11-23). Teoksessa Domorenok, Graziano & Zimmermann (eds.) The Eco-Social Polity? Theoretical, Conceptual and Empirical issues. Policy Press.

Kortetmäki, T., Puurtinen, M., Salo, M., Aro, R., Baumeister, S., Duflot, R., . . . Kotiaho, J. S. (2021-11-02). Planetary well-being. Humanities & social sciences communications, 8(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00899-3  

Kortetmäki, T., Puurtinen, M., Salo, M., Cortés-Capano, G., Karkulehto, S., Kotiaho, J. S., Planetary well-being: Ontology and ethics. Teoksessa Elo, M. ym. (2024): Interdisciplinary perspectives to planetary well-being. Routledge.   

Kortetmäki, T., Timmermann, C., & Tribaldos, T. (2025). Just transition boundaries: Clarifying the meaning of just transition. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 55, 100957.

Raippalinna, L., Hämeenaho, P., Salmi, J., Ontological differences and the pursuit of planetary well-being. Teoksessa Elo, M. ym. (2024): Interdisciplinary perspectives to planetary well-being. Routledge. 

Lukkarinen, J. P., Salo, M., Faehnle, M., Saarikoski, H., Hyysalo, S., Auvinen, K., Lähteenoja, S., & Marttila, T. (2023). Citizen energy lost in sustainability transitions : Knowledge co-production in a complex governance context. Energy Research and Social Science, 96, Article 102932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102932

Möttönen, S., Salo, M., Litmanen, T., & Konttinen, E. (2023). Ympäristönsuojelulaki vuotaa : turvekiista tunnustuskamppailuna. Alue ja ympäristö, 52(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.30663/ay.115243

Möttönen, S., Salo, M., & Konttinen, E. (2022). Kansalaiset ympäristöhallinnan osapuolena : Keski-Suomen turvekiista esimerkkinä. Alue ja ympäristö, 51(1), 207-210. https://doi.org/10.30663/ay.115637

Husu, H.-M., & Salo, M. (2022). The formation of feed-in tariffs and the emergence of wind power in Finnish routine corporatism : favoring the economics of large-scale energy production. Environmental Politics, 31(3), 478-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1926774

Project team

External members

Linda Majander

Doctoral Researcher
Jyväskylän yliopisto